Near Miss or Near Hit? Which Do You Prefer—and Why?

Near Miss Neat Hit Image

One of the many interesting controversies in safety and health (and quality, etc.) is what to call what many call a “near miss.”

Some say near miss; others say near hit; still others prefer terms like incident, event, and failure. And still other people use other terms.

Some might think it’s a meaningless point or simply a semantic issue. Others think the specific term we use for this is very important, however.

In this article, we provide an interactive, online poll to get your opinion and get the opinion of the larger community as well.

Take a moment, tell us what you think, and see what others think, too.

Near Hit v. Near Miss With Some Other Contenders

So what term do you use? Let us know using the poll below.

 

We DEFINITELY appreciate your having used the poll. And we hope you found having to think about your answer instructive or maybe even seeing how others have answered the question.

But in addition, please use the comments section below to tell us more. Do you use a different term we didn’t include in our poll? If so, let us know what it is. And, equally importantly, why do you prefer one term over the other? Or do you think it’s a tempest in a teapot?

Either way, please use our comments section below to sound off.


Our Online “Near Miss” Training Course

Our production department used the term “near miss” when they created our online training course about best practices for near misses at work. We’ve provided a simple video, below.

Conclusion: Near Miss, Near Heat–Meaningless Semantic Debate or More?

Thanks for using the poll, checking what others have to say, and leaving your comments below (please do!).

We’ll catch up with you again soon. Until then, feel free to download the free Job Hazard Analysis Guide below.

Creating Learning Objectives Btn

Job Hazard Analysis Guide

Learn how to perform a job hazard analysis on the job with our free step-by-step guide.

Download Free Guide

Creating Learning Objectives Btn
Jeffrey Dalto

Jeffrey Dalto

Jeffrey Dalto is an Instructional Designer and the Senior Learning & Development Specialist at Convergence Training. He's worked in training/learning & development for 20 years, in safety and safety training for more than 10, is an OSHA Authorized Outreach Trainer for General Industry OSHA 10 and 30, and is a member of the committee creating the upcoming ANSI Z490.2 national standard on online environmental, health, and safety training.

12 thoughts on “Near Miss or Near Hit? Which Do You Prefer—and Why?

  1. I use the term “Deviation” since all Work Instructions and / or Work Procedures follow a logical or linear pattern. When an unwanted event, near miss or near hit occurs it is an indication that there was a deviation in the work/task pattern. Personally I feel that it makes the Root Cause Analysis easier to trace when one knows where a deviation occurred.

  2. I prefer incident as it covers everything and employees don’t feel threatened or blamed. It can still be further defined as injury, lost time equipment damage etc for tracking purposes. By not pointing fingers so much it will encourage reporting so problems are discovered resulting in the ability to handle which should be the ultimate goal.

  3. Jeffrey, I chose Incident. Folks should treat those Near Misses, Near Hits, or Close Calls as Incidents, and investigate them. I agree it is hard to get away from Near Miss as the term most commonly used. Many organizations are calling them Near Miss Incidents. Near Hit Incidents might be more accurate. I like Mr. Rob Jorden’s point to further classify them with their potential consequences to raise more interest for follow up.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *